Fine....

Who has a picture of Plushy's tushy??? Please PM me or feel free to re-post it....

luther racquli wrote:

---

  shit no one can or wants to read

---

Ahhhh, so many people to apply this to.....

KatScratch wrote:

---

luther racquli wrote:

---

  shit no one can or wants to read

---

Ahhhh, so many people to apply this to.....

---

Buttercup wrote:

---

KatScratch wrote:

---

.....hmmmm, I will have to talk to E-con later.....

---

Rut-roh

---

yes, the pic's are encrypted, sent to several storage facilities throughout the world, and rsynced every 15 mins to make there their existence never disappears. So...... :)  MUHAHAHA.

luther racquli wrote:

---

luther spelen jes fien
luther dont need no wite mans english
wen luther not spel a few words rite wite pepole jumpen all over luther
it alow luther teh see teh raceists out there en they plenty raceists out there
u go rite ahead en pick on luther now

---

Good point,,,,,,,,,,, good point!!!!!!!!

"econ sand corketed!"

luther racquli wrote:

---

luther needen sum trim
luther liek eny coler es long it b wite

---

Hogboy wrote:

---

You want to get back on topic?

FINE

You people want to blast the NAACP because they are an organization for the advancement of African Americans and you say that is not fair because they don;t want the advancement of White people too. I also find a problem with the logic of that.

But what about the Freemsons and their offshoot the KKK. Freemasons Albert Pike and Nathan Bedford Forrest created the KKK to keep the Blck man down by putting on hoods and pointy hats and intimidating and even MURDERING Black people. Last I checked, the NAACP did not have to have secret meetings and cover their faces, nor have they ever entered into conspiracies to MURDER people based on the color of their skin.

The NAACP doesnt even have secret meetings. As a matter of fact, I know a high-ranking White police official wh has been a member of the NAACP for 30 years

-- Edited by Hogboy at 14:57, 2006-11-02

-- Edited by Hogboy at 14:58, 2006-11-02

---

ManImBored wrote:

---

Im sure many of you have seen this article on O.com but for those of you that have not, I am going to post it here. This is a load of crap. What is everyones thoughts on this?

http://www.dallasobserver.com/Issues/2006-10-12/news/news.html

---

Here's a quick lesson for all police officers: Pulling over the president of the Dallas NAACP branch could be hazardous to your career. Just ask Dallas County sheriff's Deputy Mike Baker, who was ordered to be transferred out of patrol last month even though two separate investigations exonerated him of any wrongdoing.

On May 30, Baker and rookie officer Patrick Arnold stopped a white minivan in Northwest Dallas with expired tags. Arnold, who was in training, talked to the motorist, filled out the ticket and returned to the patrol car. So far, so good. But Baker noticed that the motorist wrote "refused" on the signature line of the ticket. As everyone who has ever been pulled over knows, signing the ticket is not an admission of guilt, just an assurance that you will pay the fine or appear in court. Without the signature, however, officers have no way to know that you'll do either of those things and are typically instructed to arrest the offending motorist. For obvious reasons, this doesn't happen too often.

So, needing a signature, Baker, a 15-year veteran of the department, left his patrol car to talk to the motorist.

"I went up to him and said very politely, 'There seems to be some sort of misunderstanding about signing the ticket,'" Baker recalls. "He said,'There's no confusion. I'm not signing it.'"

At that point, Baker told the motorist he'd have to arrest him. The man wanted to call his wife first, but Baker told him to hang up the phone and repeated that he was under arrest. But the motorist insisted on calling his wife.

"I then reached in with my right hand and took his sleeve between my thumb and forefinger and started to pull so he would know I wasn't kidding," Baker would later tell investigators from the department. "And he needed to get out. He said real loud, 'Don't you touch me!' I let go and said, 'If you don't get out of the van, I will put you to the ground.'"

The motorist decided to sign the ticket after all.

If you think Baker acted a little harsh toward the motorist, he explains that officers have to assert control in that type of situation.

"He was trying to take charge of our traffic stop," says Baker, who is built like a nose tackle. "He was trying to run the show, and we're trained that we have to be in charge. You can't let the violator take charge of your traffic stop."

After the motorist signed the ticket, Baker returned to the patrol car to give him his copy. Somehow, Baker dropped the ticket on a clipboard the motorist was holding and a breeze blew it to the ground. That seemed to be the tipping point.

"He starts screaming that he's the president of the NAACP," Baker says.

Soon after, Bob Lydia, whose wife is also active with the NAACP, met with Sheriff Lupe Valdez and her chief deputy, Jesse Flores, and filed criminal charges against Baker, claiming that he abused his authority. The department launched both a criminal and internal affairs investigation of Baker. A few weeks later, both inquiries exonerated him.

It was probably an easy call. For one, Lydia admitted to investigators that he initially refused to sign the ticket and only afterward did Baker grab him. Baker himself admitted as much, saying that he touched the motorist only after Lydia continued to talk on his cell phone even though he had been informed he was under arrest. Finally and perhaps most important, Baker's partner corroborated his story.

Patrick Arnold says that Baker never used excessive force, and Lydia was the one making a scene. "He wanted everyone's name and badge number," Arnold recalls. "He pulled out his business card, and it said 'president of the NAACP.'"

Baker says that Lydia also wrote down their license plate number.

"It appeared to me that he was being rather hardheaded," Arnold says. "I thought the whole situation was kind of silly."

So that should have been the end of it, right? Well, here's where things get murky. Last month, Flores transferred Baker from the traffic division to court services, claiming he did so only because Baker requested a new assignment. But Baker says that he never asked to leave and claims that Lydia is using his political influence to get him off the street. Lydia did not return several phone calls, but the Dallas County Peace Officer's Association, which represents black officers, backs up Baker's claim and says that they talked about Baker in a meeting with Flores.

"The president of the NAACP requested that Baker be removed from the street," says Charles Bailey, the first vice president of the association. "We did bring it up [in a meeting with Flores], and he advised us that he would remove Baker from the street."

Bailey insists that the association was merely relaying a message from Lydia and not acting in anyway as an advocate. In any case, Raul Reyna, a spokesman for the department, says that Flores did not respond to any political pressure to transfer Baker.

Meanwhile, Baker's black friends are sticking up for him. "Mike is no racist. I've known him for 13 years," Deputy Keith Johnson says. "If he was cleared by IAD and CID [internal affairs and criminal investigations], I don't understand why he was transferred."

For Baker, being transferred after enduring two separate investigations into a routine motor stop is simply adding injury to insults. He plans to fight his reassignment and is talking to an attorney.

"I feel like Flores is throwing me to the wolves, taking one civilian's word over mine and my partner and everyone else who has investigated this thing," he says. "He is attacking my character, making it look like I have done something I didn't."

**said article.

texaschickeee wrote:

---

ManImBored wrote:

---

Im sure many of you have seen this article on O.com but for those of you that have not, I am going to post it here. This is a load of crap. What is everyones thoughts on this?

http://www.dallasobserver.com/Issues/2006-10-12/news/news.html

---

  

Here's a quick lesson for all police officers: Pulling over the president of the Dallas NAACP branch could be hazardous to your career. Just ask Dallas County sheriff's Deputy Mike Baker, who was ordered to be transferred out of patrol last month even though two separate investigations exonerated him of any wrongdoing.

On May 30, Baker and rookie officer Patrick Arnold stopped a white minivan in Northwest Dallas with expired tags. Arnold, who was in training, talked to the motorist, filled out the ticket and returned to the patrol car. So far, so good. But Baker noticed that the motorist wrote "refused" on the signature line of the ticket. As everyone who has ever been pulled over knows, signing the ticket is not an admission of guilt, just an assurance that you will pay the fine or appear in court. Without the signature, however, officers have no way to know that you'll do either of those things and are typically instructed to arrest the offending motorist. For obvious reasons, this doesn't happen too often.

So, needing a signature, Baker, a 15-year veteran of the department, left his patrol car to talk to the motorist.

"I went up to him and said very politely, 'There seems to be some sort of misunderstanding about signing the ticket,'" Baker recalls. "He said,'There's no confusion. I'm not signing it.'"

At that point, Baker told the motorist he'd have to arrest him. The man wanted to call his wife first, but Baker told him to hang up the phone and repeated that he was under arrest. But the motorist insisted on calling his wife.

"I then reached in with my right hand and took his sleeve between my thumb and forefinger and started to pull so he would know I wasn't kidding," Baker would later tell investigators from the department. "And he needed to get out. He said real loud, 'Don't you touch me!' I let go and said, 'If you don't get out of the van, I will put you to the ground.'"

The motorist decided to sign the ticket after all.

If you think Baker acted a little harsh toward the motorist, he explains that officers have to assert control in that type of situation.

"He was trying to take charge of our traffic stop," says Baker, who is built like a nose tackle. "He was trying to run the show, and we're trained that we have to be in charge. You can't let the violator take charge of your traffic stop."

After the motorist signed the ticket, Baker returned to the patrol car to give him his copy. Somehow, Baker dropped the ticket on a clipboard the motorist was holding and a breeze blew it to the ground. That seemed to be the tipping point.

"He starts screaming that he's the president of the NAACP," Baker says.

Soon after, Bob Lydia, whose wife is also active with the NAACP, met with Sheriff Lupe Valdez and her chief deputy, Jesse Flores, and filed criminal charges against Baker, claiming that he abused his authority. The department launched both a criminal and internal affairs investigation of Baker. A few weeks later, both inquiries exonerated him.

It was probably an easy call. For one, Lydia admitted to investigators that he initially refused to sign the ticket and only afterward did Baker grab him. Baker himself admitted as much, saying that he touched the motorist only after Lydia continued to talk on his cell phone even though he had been informed he was under arrest. Finally and perhaps most important, Baker's partner corroborated his story.

Patrick Arnold says that Baker never used excessive force, and Lydia was the one making a scene. "He wanted everyone's name and badge number," Arnold recalls. "He pulled out his business card, and it said 'president of the NAACP.'"

Baker says that Lydia also wrote down their license plate number.

"It appeared to me that he was being rather hardheaded," Arnold says. "I thought the whole situation was kind of silly."

So that should have been the end of it, right? Well, here's where things get murky. Last month, Flores transferred Baker from the traffic division to court services, claiming he did so only because Baker requested a new assignment. But Baker says that he never asked to leave and claims that Lydia is using his political influence to get him off the street. Lydia did not return several phone calls, but the Dallas County Peace Officer's Association, which represents black officers, backs up Baker's claim and says that they talked about Baker in a meeting with Flores.

"The president of the NAACP requested that Baker be removed from the street," says Charles Bailey, the first vice president of the association. "We did bring it up [in a meeting with Flores], and he advised us that he would remove Baker from the street."

Bailey insists that the association was merely relaying a message from Lydia and not acting in anyway as an advocate. In any case, Raul Reyna, a spokesman for the department, says that Flores did not respond to any political pressure to transfer Baker.

Meanwhile, Baker's black friends are sticking up for him. "Mike is no racist. I've known him for 13 years," Deputy Keith Johnson says. "If he was cleared by IAD and CID [internal affairs and criminal investigations], I don't understand why he was transferred."

For Baker, being transferred after enduring two separate investigations into a routine motor stop is simply adding injury to insults. He plans to fight his reassignment and is talking to an attorney.

"I feel like Flores is throwing me to the wolves, taking one civilian's word over mine and my partner and everyone else who has investigated this thing," he says. "He is attacking my character, making it look like I have done something I didn't."

 

 

**said article.

---

Texas, how can you compare a pissing contest over a traffic summons with the murders committed by the Freemason based KKK.......Not to mention that there is strong evidence that JFK was killed by Freemasons and the Warren Commission which covered it up was made up entirely of Freemasons. Kennedy was a supporter of Civil Rights for Blacks and certain factions wanted him dead. It is no coincidence that his assassination happened in Dallas and Osward was being esorted by Masonic Dallas cops when Jack Ruby killed him before he had a chance to talk to the press.

Funny how you take the topic of the Freemason-based KKK and racist, murderous hate crimes and compare it to an NAACP official arguing over a traffic ticket